Back Home Advertising Visit WashingtonTimes.com
 

Home...Europe...Denmark...
DENMARK2002

Denmark’s balancing act:
A short history of Denmark

A wooden headpost carved by the Vikings.
Courtesy Universitetets Oldsaksamling

From about 9000 to 4000 B.C., Denmark and England were part of the same land mass. Then the oceans rose so high that not only did England float away, Denmark itself was inundated and became the 406 islands it is now.

It is fitting that a state that now trades in knowledge and expertise should use the life of one of its great intellectuals as the seminal point of its existence. Saxo Grammaticus, 1160-1208, wrote Gesta Danorum (The Deeds of the Danes), which was a history of Denmark from earliest times to his own age. The Danes were mightily impressed, and Gesta Danorum has been the touchstone for every book of Danish history since then.

Bo Lidegaard, author and historian, explains why this book is so vital. “It is very important for a state to have a history which leads up to its present formation. Saxo is the one historian that gathered together all the old myths and legends into a coherent history, one that leads to the fact that Denmark is there, the rulers are the legitimate rulers and this is how we got to where we are.” With Saxo Grammaticus, legend ended and history began.

Denmark has always been a country extremely dependent on its exchanges with the world. It is outreaching as a trading and commercial nation, and that has always had two aspects. The desire and the necessity to reach out, “despite the fear that the people we are trading with, who always tend to be bigger and stronger, will swallow us,” Lidegaard says. “So there has been a very deliberate policy of a balancing the influence. Whenever we get too close to one side, you see this tendency for caution.”

The reign of Christian IV (1588-1648), Denmark’s sole larger-than-life monarch, consolidated the patch of squabbling fiefdoms under the power of the Danish Crown, and Copenhagen began to come into its own. From that point onwards, Denmark was a country, not a vague collection of islands.

The Danes are certainly not cowards, but their Viking days have taught them that far more can come from peaceful trading than plunder. They have had a huge fleet and even had an empire of sorts. They had colonies in India, the Caribbean and Africa, and there was even a Danish East India company. They were the dominant power in Scandinavia. “We were controlling the opening of the Baltic, had both sides of the Oreseund and had therefore control over all shipments from the Baltic." This was huge revenue for the fledgling crown. They have lost that, bit by bit, “through four centuries of wars, which we have never been very good at," Lidegaard says.

Denmark has had several wars with Sweden. But they are countries of brotherhood. “We speak (almost) the same language,” says Lidegaard. “The way we have constructed society since the middle 19th century is very similar. We have political structures and values that are very alike. Today Sweden is a big brother, with a different economic structure. They aim for big industries, we have big agriculture. We have niche (industries) and they make cars.”

In World War I, Denmark was neutral, but, in the words of Bertel Haarder, minister of European affairs, it was “at the cost of our independence. We had to accept it when the Germans said ‘you have to place mines in your straits to keep the British out.’ We did so.

The legend of Denmark in World War II

The way the story goes, the Nazis occupied Denmark and instructed all the Jews to wear yellow stars of David on their arm. The king went on the radio saying that he was going to wear one and that he expected all loyal Danes to do the same. Knowing the Danes, it’s believable. Alas, it didn’t happen. Nobody in Denmark wore a yellow star at all.

Denmark, watching the Wehrmacht roll through the rest of the world, chose a very particular course. They opted not to match metal with Hitler. Instead, they drove a very cunning bargain. “We established a system by which we accepted that the Germans controlled the country but on the condition that we had total liberty to run it, which meant that parliament, the police -- the whole civil administration remained in force. So what they got was a peaceful occupation. They didn’t have to force the labor out of the country or tie up their troops. What we got was Danish legislation, which made clear from the outset that no laws would be passed against the Jews. That meant that the Holocaust was not pursued.”

In Aug. 1943, however, after two years of relentless Nazi pressure, the government resigned. The Germans had commanded them to introduce Jewish laws, and the Danes could not in good conscience carry them out. The Germans, even the SS, realized that if they kept this up it would no longer be possible for the Danes to work with them. Danes have the stuff of collaboration, but there are certain points beyond which you cannot push them. This was clearly one of them.

So the Germans actually warned the Jews, and two days later Denmark’s 7,000 Jews vanished. First into society, hiding with Danish friends. Then they fled to neutral Sweden. The Nazis found 400, who were all shipped to Theresienstadt, the safest concentration camp there was, and allowed to have Red Cross packages. Almost all of them survived.

There were resistance groups, saboteurs, and all the rest. But “this system of collaboration between Danish and German governments kept even the Holocaust away.”

Postwar Denmark

Denmark has participated in every attempt at peace and fair trade that the world has come up with. It is a founding member of the UN, an early member of NATO, the EC and the EU. Their economy has been largely prosperous. Politically, it has always been cautious, gradual, and consensus-based.

Denmark had a natural alliance with the West during the Cold War, but, in the words of Bo Lidegaard, they “always kept a distance but also would never be on unfriendly terms. During the Cold War we see Denmark being very firmly within the Western camp, in all our shared values and history, made us a very devoted member of NATO. But at the same time we were eager not to create a more hostile environment with the Soviets. We have very strong ties with the United States for our security, but never got into any ‘evil empire’ talk. We stayed correct.” This is a balancing act they have been doing for a thousand years.

Lately, as of Nov. 2001, Denmark has shifted to the right. The Social Democrats, who have been running the show almost without interruption since World War II, had the mandate to take care of the people. Now, they have done their job and the people are taken care of, and they’re middle class and they feel that they can better take care of themselves. The Social Democrats were a classic victim of their own success.

As for the Fogh Rasmussen government, its most important domestic agenda is to lower taxes. David Kaufman, a prominent financier, says, “In the last 25 years, Denmark went too far in a socialistic direction. Now, like the rest of Europe, we have gone back. We reached a stage where people do not want to pay so many taxes, and there’s a surge back to protect the individual’s right.”



SPONSORS

Systematic Software Engineering
Terma
Lundbeck
Marriott Hotel Copenhagen
Radisson SAS Royal Hotel
SAS
Danfoss
A.P. Moller (Maersk)
Ferring Pharmaceuticals
CMC Biopharmaceuticals
TEAM
Project Director
Maxwell Orme Johnson
Writen By
Kevin Lambert
(unless otherwise noted)
Special Thanks To:

The Royal Danish Embassy in Washington, D.C.

Stephen Brugger
AmCham, Copenhagen

Suzanne Kurstein
DABF

 

© InternationalReports.net / The Washington Times 1994-2006

 
The Washington Times